#Knights and dragons heroic mode how to#
#Knights and dragons heroic mode plus#

Similarly, it suggests magic items in a wish list so if someone is doing a build that requires X to work, there's no sudden surprise about it 5 levels in. Period' and then there aren't any.Д«ut it is a lot better to sit down and talk with the players and say, 'Oh, there are no divine PCs in my game because all the gods are dead on Athas.' and one player might say, 'Oh, could I have some sort of divine spark hidden in me?' and you might say, 'I'd really prefer you pick one of the non-divine PCs because the gods are really, really dead.' or you could say, 'That seems interesting - let's talk about what that means.'

#Knights and dragons heroic mode how to#

A lot of 4e's advice is about how to make things more fun and it gives suggestions about how to resolve conflicts before they happen rather than afterwards - a DM can feel free to set house rules and say, 'There are no X in my world. people like to think 4e said the players should get the items they want, but it doesn't actually say that. And you shouldn't do something like give a player who wants a sword an axe, simply because they'll likely just sell it or disenchant it or enchant it into sword form.

The paradigm is that DMs and players should all be having fun - and a *possible* way to accomplish that is by having players list items that they find interesting and exciting and then have the DM place some of them for the PCs to find. That's not really 4e's paradigm in the first place. Rarity steps a little on players in theory, but it does solve a number of problems and at least relatively reasonable GMs should still give out what players want, without needing to worry that they'll enchant 12 level 3 items when they're 12th level and bork things up. I think the INTENT of allowing PCs to create ANY item (short of an artifact) was to allow for player freedom, not to make it easy to pull off 3e-esque system exploits.

#Knights and dragons heroic mode plus#

Plus it got rid of tracking stuff at the same time. That opened up a lot of design space in terms of stuff that was OK as a daily ONCE a day, but not 2-3 or more times a day. It also allowed for many more trivial daily effects. Rarity simply prevented the multiples from ever existing. A number of items fell to this problem and got nerfed. The problem with the original rules was that it was quite easy to design items that were perfectly good, their daily power was quite appropriate, BUT being able to acquire several of the same item would lead to multiple uses of said power, which was not so good. theme.ДЇrankly though, I think that the later rarity rule is a MUCH better notion in terms of item design space. It's also easy to see how giving one more use of BFP would fit the Artificer or an artificer-themed. It could be seen to add a bit of design space - in that it's easier to play with character abilities.ДЇor instance, we can now, add or remove a use of BFP for things such as consequences of a SC (or some very niche monster). It's pretty much what amounts to a QoL improvement. If we had the rules in an editable format, this would be a simple case of 'Ctrl+H', but alas. Not much, other than the whole of the written text. The other intent is a simple ease of acceptability of the 'one item daily power per day per tier' by re-framing it as a player ability. The intent of the basic effect is to replace/reduce/remove the number of items which have a daily power that amounts to their critical effect. 'House Rule' to re-frame the 'one daily item power use per tier' (short version : forum ate my post)ДЄll characters have a new power that can used once per day per tier : Bring Forth Power (BFP)Д«asic effect: a character can apply the critical hit effect of a weapon or implement on a regular hit.ДЄdvanced effect: magic items replace their daily powers with the same effect that can now be used by spending a use of BFP.ДЄdditional new rule: items can only bear the strain of BFP once per day.